Operational transfer pricing case studies

The transfer involves the value of intangible assets between Medtronic and its Puerto Rican manufacturing affiliate for the tax years 2005 and 2006. The court had initially sided with Medtronic, but the IRS filed an appeal. In mid-2022, the court found that Medtronic did not meet its burden of proof requirement, and the IRS abused its discretion by modifying the method it proposed Medtronic used.

  • They do so in order to keep companies from shifting profits to divisions that are in tax haven countries.
  • If the price does differ, then one of the entities is at a disadvantage and would ultimately start buying from the market to get a better price.
  • The transfer prices affect the company’s tax liabilities if different jurisdictions have different tax rates.
  • In the following examples, assume that Division A can sell only to Division B, and that Division B’s only source of components is Division A. Example 1 has been reproduced but with costs split between variable and fixed.
  • Example 1 suggested a transfer price between $18 and $80, but exactly where the transfer price is set in that range vastly alters the perceived profitability and performance of each division.

In either situation, one entity benefits while the other is hurt by a transfer price that varies from market value. For example, assume entity A and entity B are two unique segments of Company ABC. Entity A builds and sells wheels, and entity B assembles and sells bicycles. Entity A may also sell wheels to entity B through an intracompany transaction. If entity A offers entity B a rate lower than market value, entity B will have a lower cost of goods sold (COGS) and higher earnings than it otherwise would have.

Products and services

Performance-related pay
If there is a system of performance-related pay, the remuneration of employees in each division will be affected as profits change. If they feel that their remuneration is affected unfairly, employees’ morale will be damaged. One of the key disadvantages is that the seller is at risk of selling for less, netting them less revenue. The Comparable Uncontrolled Price Method is one of the most commonly used transfer pricing methods. Permit each division to make a profit
Profits are motivating and allow divisional performance to be measured using positive ROI or positive RI.

  • For this reason, many upstream divisions price their goods and services as if they were selling them to an external customer at a market price.
  • As these different divisions do business with each other, buying and selling different products, the transfer prices they set play a critical role in determining how they’ll share profits.
  • If there is no market price at all from which to derive a transfer price, then an alternative is to create a price based on a component’s contribution margin.
  • As a result, the financial reporting of transfer pricing has strict guidelines and is closely watched by tax authorities.
  • While this practice can result in greater profits for multinational corporations, it can also lead to greater scrutiny and regulation from tax authorities like the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

These prices are monitored closely, and they must be reported in the company’s financial statements for auditors and regulators. If it is not possible to use the market pricing technique just noted, then consider using the general concept, but freelancers incorporating some adjustments to the price. For example, you can reduce the market price to account for the presumed absence of bad debts, since corporate management will likely intervene and force a payment if there is a risk of non-payment.

However, there is much debate and ambiguity surrounding how transfer pricing between divisions should be accounted for and which division should take the brunt of the tax burden. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act upon such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.

There are different methods of setting transfer prices, such as market-based, cost-based, negotiated, or hybrid methods. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, depending on the context and the criteria used to evaluate them. For instance, a market-based method may be preferred if there is a competitive and transparent external market for the intermediate product, as it can provide a clear benchmark and incentive for efficiency.

Rate this article

Now the cost of selling a handle isn’t just the $7 marginal cost of production, but also the $3 in lost profit (opportunity cost) from not selling the handle directly to consumers. An additional topic that impacts the overall level of corporate profitability is the total amount of income taxes paid. If a company has subsidiaries located in different tax jurisdictions, it can use transfer prices to adjust the reported profit level of each subsidiary. Ideally, the corporate parent wants to recognize the most taxable income in those tax jurisdictions where corporate income taxes are lowest.

Head office therefore gives each division the impression of making autonomous decisions, but in reality each division has been manipulated into making the choices head office wants. Divisional managers are therefore likely to resent being told by head office which products they should make and sell. Ideally, divisions should be given a simple, understandable objective such as maximising divisional profit. As you can see, therefore, transfer prices can have a profound effect on group performance because they affect divisional performance, motivation and decision making.

Why Is Transfer Price Used?

Assume companies A and B are two separate divisions of Corporation X, which sells laptop computers. Company B, on the other hand, is the corporation’s public brand and is responsible for sales. To avoid operating at a loss, company A must charge company B a transfer price for each laptop it purchases to sell to the public.

Transfer Pricing and the IRS

At KPMG, our approach to operational transfer pricing enables you to select the best methodology to address your company’s unique policy implementation needs. Basically, the transfer price must be as good as the outside selling price to get Division B to transfer inside the group. In accounting, many amounts can be legitimately calculated in a number of different ways and can be correctly represented by a number of different values. For example, both marginal and total absorption cost can simultaneously give the correct cost of production, but which version of cost you should use depends on what you are trying to do.

Thus, these countries have strict regulations to prevent companies from using transfer pricing as a tax avoidance strategy. Finally, upstream and downstream divisions’ managers can negotiate a transfer price that is mutually beneficial for each division. When setting prices, sellers need to factor in company goals, performance evaluation, autonomy, capacity, and cost structure. The Company needed to replace its existing transfer pricing tool because it was slow, lacked documentation, and was difficult to reconfigure in response to business changes.

Buying options

For instance, the availability and reliability of information needed for the transfer pricing method may not be easy or possible to obtain or verify. Additionally, the complexity and variability of situations must be taken into account, as external market conditions may vary by region or time and internal transactions may involve different products or services. Furthermore, the transfer pricing method must be aligned with the strategic and operational objectives of the company, however this may not always be compatible or balanced.

Market prices are based on supply-demand relationships, whereas transfer prices may be subject to other organizational forces. Additionally, intra-entity animosity might arise, especially if the transfer price is appreciably higher or lower than the market price as one of the parties will feel cheated. The transfer price impacts the performance of both subsidiaries that transact with one another. A price that is too low disincentivizes an upstream division from selling to a downstream division as it results in lower revenues. A price that is too high disincentives the downstream division from buying from the upstream division, as costs are too high.

Transfer Prices and Tax Liabilities

Green’s orders are highly seasonal, so Entwhistle finds that it cannot fulfill orders from its other customers at all during the high point of Green’s production season. Also, because the transfer price is set at cost, Entwhistle’s management finds that it no longer has a reason to drive down its costs, and so its production efficiencies stagnate. The simplest and most elegant transfer price is to use the market price. By doing so, the upstream subsidiary can sell either internally or externally and earn the same profit with either option.

It can achieve this by lowering the transfer prices of components going into the subsidiaries located in those tax jurisdictions having the lowest tax rates. Transfer prices are used when individual entities of a larger multi-entity firm are treated and measured as separately run entities. While it is common for multi-entity corporations to be consolidated on a financial reporting basis, they may report each entity separately for tax purposes.

A company that transfers goods between multiple divisions needs to establish a transfer price so that each division can track its own efficiency. Companies will use various methods to determine the minimum transfer price, factoring in different costs related to production and what the goods would normally sell for in the retail marketplace. If there is no market price at all on which to base a transfer price, you could consider using a system that creates a transfer price based on the cost of the components being transferred. The best way to do this is to add a margin onto the cost, where you compile the standard cost of a component, add a standard profit margin, and use the result as the transfer price.

Leave a Reply